As little as a decade ago, the concept of having your DNA (your genome) sequenced as a matter of routine probably seemed far-fetched. Yet fast-forward a few years and extraordinary advances in DNA sequencing technology, increasing its speed and precision, and a significant reduction in cost, has opened the floodgates for direct-to-consumer personal DNA testing from the comfort of the home.
Gaining insight into one’s DNA code could satisfy a curiosity as to ancestral origins and provide a general overview of genetic traits, resolve paternity, or reduce concern over a life-time risk of certain diseases.
Marketed as a device to allow the customer to take control of their health, saliva or buccal swab tests can be purchased online from overseas-based commercial companies. The kits are simply posted out, and samples are collected and returned in the mail (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services 2016). Rather than the whole DNA code of each individual being ‘read’, certain genetic sequences are mapped which have previously been identified to contain regions related to disease susceptibility. This approach delivers the individual a DNA ‘snapshot’ identifying genetic variants that occur in the population and can be used to calculate the relative risk of future disease.
The potential benefits of ‘self’ genetic testing include:
The potential pitfalls of ‘self’ genetic testing include:
Parents may choose to include their children in DNA assessment to trace family patterns; however, the ethical implications for unconsenting minors who have a ‘right-not-to-know’ is unwavering. Should an unexpected harmful mutation be identified, that child must bear that knowledge, which could affect not only their risk of a disease but also the possibility that their own children could inherit the faulty gene. Such considerations also extend to untested family members, such as siblings, who do not wish to obtain such information. This raises the ethical complication of whether a doctor has a clinical responsibility to inform that person or not.
Being in possession of our genetic information could have legal ramifications relating to the provision of genetic information to health insurers. The potential for misappropriation of this data to discriminate against an individual is a genuine concern.
Despite remarkable technological advances in our ability to examine our genes close-up, we are much further behind in regulating the use of this information and defusing the ethical minefield that self genomic testing introduces (National Health and Medical Research Council 2014). The medical and economic benefits of harnessing big genomic data are plain to see and will certainly be the future in the fight against disease. The conversation as to how an individual’s data is utilised for the good and how they are supported and protected is paramount.