Permissive Hypotension for Trauma Below the Neck
Published: 17 October 2023
Published: 17 October 2023
Most potentially-preventable deaths following major trauma are caused by uncontrolled bleeding (Nevin & Brohi 2017).
However, researchers have found that early, high-dose fluid resuscitation may cause trauma patients experiencing severe haemorrhage to suffer adverse effects such as dilutional coagulopathy or acceleration of the haemorrhage (Kudo et al. 2017; Das et al. 2023).
Nickson (2020) describes permissive hypotension, also known as hypotensive resuscitation or low-volume resuscitation, as a controversial and uncommon method of fluid resuscitation that may result in more desirable patient outcomes.
This method is now being discussed by more and more prehospital trauma services across the world as a strategy to replace the older philosophy of higher volume fluid substitution. A systematic review by Mapstone et al. (2003) has shown a significantly higher survival rate in all animal trials when permissive hypotension strategies are applied.
The review also found that out of permissive hypotension, cyclic hyper resuscitation, and vasopressors, vasopressors had the worst patient outcomes (Mapstone et al. 2003).
While permissive hypotension can potentially prevent the adverse effects of early, high-dose fluid resuscitation, it has its own unique risks, such as tissue hypoperfusion, which must also be considered (Kudo et al. 2017). Hence, low blood pressure is not the goal but a symptom in order to minimize further clot disruption and haemodilution.
This article relates to permissive hypotension for trauma below the neck.
Permissive hypotension is the intentional under-resuscitation of a patient, where the goal is to maintain a blood pressure that is adequate but in the lower than normal range (Moore & Moore 2018; Nevin & Brohi 2017; Kudo et al. 2017).
This is achieved by restricting the amount of fluid administered while the patient is actively bleeding, rather than aggressively resuscitating (Kudo et al. 2017; Nevin & Brohi 2017).
Permissive hypotension is considered ‘damage control resuscitation‘ that is employed only until haemorrhage control has been achieved (e.g. successful tourniquet on a catastrophically bleeding extremity) (Nickson 2020).
Aggressively resuscitating trauma patients was once considered the standard method of restoring circulating volume and maintaining organ perfusion (Ramesh et al. 2019).
However, during active bleeding, this strategy may be unable to resuscitate the patient, restore perfusion and clear oxygen debt (Nevin & Brohi 2017) due to the increased haemodilution of the blood as well as the associated reduction of the clotting factors. A combination of blood transfusion and fresh frozen plasma would be the gold standard; however, this is highly difficult in a prehospital environment.
Additionally, aggressive resuscitation during active bleeding may lead to serious adverse effects, including:
(NBA 2011; Moore & Moore 2018; Kudo et al. 2017; Nevin & Brohi 2017)
While aggressive resuscitation increases blood pressure, potentially causing disruption to the clot and consequently, further blood loss (Nickson 2020), permissive hypotension aims to keep blood pressure at a low enough (but adequate) level to optimize organ perfusion and coagulation until hemostasis is achieved (Nevin & Brohi 2017).
Note that low blood pressure is not the goal; rather, it is a tool used as a compromise until the patient is able to undergo a surgical intervention to stop the otherwise uncontrollable bleeding (Nickson 2020).
Permissive hypotension is a method of rapid stabilization suitable for prehospital settings and should not be used once the bleeding has been controlled in the operating room, where the gold standard is the volume substitution with blood products (Das et al. 2023).
Generally, permissive hypotension is indicated for hemodynamically unstable patients who are experiencing uncontrolled bleeding (Das et al. 2023).
It is not considered an appropriate strategy for traumatic brain injury or spinal injury, as tissue hypoperfusion in the central nervous system may cause secondary injury (Kudo et al. 2017).
Permissive hypotension should be considered on a case-by-case basis, and patients should be assessed for prior history that could place them at risk (Das et al. 2023).
Those who may be appropriate candidates include:
(Das et al. 2023)
Permissive hypotension is associated with:
(Ramesh et al. 2019; Das et al. 2023)
(Nickson 2020; NBA 2011; Das et al. 2023)
When confronted with an acutely bleeding trauma patient, the priorities are to control the haemorrhage; ensure organ perfusion whilst preventing coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia from developing; and quickly transport the patient to a facility where definitive haemorrhage control can be achieved (Ambulance Victoria 2019).
The patient should be handled carefully. Limit movement, avoid log rolls and take care during transportation in order to avoid disrupting early clot formation (Nottingham University Hospitals 2019).
If the patient’s systolic blood pressure (SBP) is less than 70 mmHg:
(Ambulance Victoria 2019)
If the patient’s systolic blood pressure (SBP) is 70 mmHg or more:
(Ambulance Victoria 2019)
(Ambulance Victoria 2019)
Note: This article is intended as a refresher and should not replace best-practice care. Always refer to your organization's policy on resuscitation and permissive hypotension.
Question 1 of 2
True or false: Permissive hypotension is suitable for traumatic brain injury patients.